Comments on: An Audit of Boomerang’s Performance https://nicj.net/an-audit-of-boomerangs-performance/ Home to Nic Jansma, a software developer at Akamai building high-performance websites, apps and open-source tools. Tue, 05 Jan 2021 17:23:02 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.5.3 By: Nic https://nicj.net/an-audit-of-boomerangs-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-1246053 Tue, 13 Aug 2019 02:00:35 +0000 http://nicj.net/?p=2093#comment-1246053 In reply to Anonymous.

Unfortunately there isn’t a similar analysis for rum.js (which is EOL and not being actively worked on).

]]> By: Anonymous https://nicj.net/an-audit-of-boomerangs-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-1246027 Mon, 05 Aug 2019 20:27:52 +0000 http://nicj.net/?p=2093#comment-1246027 Excellent article. Is there a similar analysis done for Akamai’s rum.js and if so what are the findings?

]]> By: Nic https://nicj.net/an-audit-of-boomerangs-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-1244845 Fri, 13 Apr 2018 02:44:06 +0000 http://nicj.net/?p=2093#comment-1244845 In reply to Joe.

Yup! It will be good for us to move to H2 for that and other small possible perf benefits, so we’re hoping to enable it soon!

]]> By: Joe https://nicj.net/an-audit-of-boomerangs-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-1244776 Thu, 22 Mar 2018 13:03:10 +0000 http://nicj.net/?p=2093#comment-1244776 Great article, thanks for sharing.

One thing–understood that you wouldn’t benefit much from the multiplexing element of HTTP2, but wouldn’t it be desirable to take advantage of header compression?

]]>